I know this is politics as usually but If I Were one of the people mention in the e-mail below I might be just a little upset
I haven’t even received confirmation that Munger’s coming yet (let alone whether or not he’s bringing money). The Potarazu family has written $332,250 to us since ’13. Munger has written $100,600 (and that’s only if you reach back to 2008). I don’t understand why we’d be rewarding someone for giving to OFA over us. I also don’t understand why everyone seems to hate Sreedhar so much. He’s hands down the most consistent donor in the Mid-Atlantic region and causes far fewer headaches than others that come to mind.
Shreedhar is getting a greet. Munger is the largest donor to OFA and it would be nice to take care of him from the DNC side.
Jordan Kaplan National Finance Director Democratic National Committee ) email@example.com<mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org> [cid:image001.png@01D1B031.FF1A6120] On May 17, 2016, at 11:43 AM, Shapiro, Alexandra
<ShapiroA@dnc.org<mailto:ShapiroA@dnc.org>> wrote: Why?
Looks good – can you switch Sreedhar and Munger. Jordan Kaplan National Finance Director Democratic National Committee
(email@example.com<mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org> <image001.png> On May 17, 2016, at 11:39 AM, Shapiro, Alexandra <ShapiroA@dnc.org<mailto:ShapiroA@dnc.org>> wrote: Let me know if you have any edits Alex Shapiro
Jordan Kaplan National Finance Director Democratic National Committee (email@example.com<mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org> <image001.png> On May 17, 2016, at 11:39 AM, Shapiro, Alexandra <ShapiroA@dnc.org<mailto:ShapiroA@dnc.org>> wrote: Let me know if you have any edits Alex Shapiro Mid Atlantic & PAC Finance Director Democratic National Committee”( Sconce wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/669)
Going thru the Wikileaks dump ran across this I know it’s old news but I still find it interesting just how the Democrats have no problem even telling each other a barefaced lie
” Andy – I want to share something with you that is probably going to make you angry, but then I am going to give you an opportunity to do something about it. For months, you’ve heard the Clinton campaign endlessly repeat in interviews and on social media that they have raised millions and millions of dollars for state parties through something called the “Hillary Victory Fund.” They’ve even used it as an attack line to insinuate Bernie wasn’t willing to help down-ballot Democrats. Well, yesterday morning, thanks to a Politico investigation, we found out that less than 1 percent of the $61 million raised by the Victory Fund has stayed in state party coffers. And indeed, the majority of the money spent by the Victory Fund has gone to benefit Hillary Clinton’s primary campaign against us. The piece said some state party fundraisers believe they are basically acting as “money laundering conduits.”( source: /wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/9288 )
So in their own words, they are acting as “money laundering conduits.” for the Clinton campaign. So multiple state parties got about 6 million to share among themselves and the lion’s share went to Clinton campaign which comes out to about 55 million sounds fair right? Lol, One wonders just where that money went? to buy what or who? It seems if it has the Clinton name attached to any money it either comes up missing or the money allotment seems to overwhelmingly fall in the favor of the Clinton name as in this case. No wonder Poor Old Bernie didn’t know what hit him.
If they are this dishonest within their own party how do you think they will treat the rest of us?
The Democrats are crying and whining about Wikileaks and their information dump on them still!Poor babies.If the shoe was on the other foot and it was the Republicans that got the dump, the Dems would be dancing in the streets, and the media would be having a holiday putting out even the smallest piece of hostile press that might hurt Republicans .So suck it up buttercups!
The Democrats are now complaining “In the case of the DNC hack, the Clinton campaign and some policy experts believe that the Russian government was attempting to influence the outcome of the U.S. election by passing damaging information to WikiLeaks on the eve of the Democratic convention.” But Clinton campaigns less they forget; their fearless leader is under suspicion of play for pay with the Russian government for some mining and a few other middle eastern governments for other favors when she was Secretary of State but they want us to overlook that and feel sorry for the poor babies
The Democrats would also like to bury the fact that they influenced the media to put out nasty things about one of their own so Hillary would get the nod to lead the party costing the party chair her job ( Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.)but don’t worry about Debbie she has a new job working for Hillary.
to end this tale I will end this way Suck it up Buttercup!!!
“Is Trump being helped by Russia” This seems to be Hillary’s new catch phrase! Hillary and the Democrats are trying to blame Russia for the email leaks and somehow link Trump to them.
One small problem with that is that Hillary made a deal with Russia for our Uranium and then very substantial monies flow to the Clinton Foundation
TheNew York Times reported in April 2015 about how those donations spiked as the deal for Rosatom to secure Uranium One and its holdings in the United States was brought to a successful conclusion, along with one of Bill Clinton’s biggest paydays ever:
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.
[…] Whether the donations played any role in the approval of the uranium deal is unknown. But the episode underscores the special ethical challenges presented by the Clinton Foundation, headed by a former president who relied heavily on foreign cash to accumulate $250 million in assets even as his wife helped steer American foreign policy as secretary of state, presiding over decisions with the potential to benefit the foundation’s donors.
So it would seem
So it appears Hillary is a better friend to Russia then Trump will ever be.
Lets look at the democrats have you seen their main stage
Old Glory seems to be taking a back seat * flags set well off the center of the stage as if the democrats are a shame of our flag.There are more Mexican flags waving inside and outside of the democrat convention then our flag.Then you go outside and count the number Hammer & Sickle flags being waved by groups supporting democrats one begins to wonder who these modern democrats do support.
So is Russia supporting Trump I don’t think so.It would be more likely they are hoping for a Hillary win
I’m not a Rush fan I will admit it.Don’t get me wrong I have nothing bad to say about the man he is just not my cup of tea.But I must say that he hit it square on the head today. Here is the link if you missed it http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2016/07/27/trump_hijacks_the_democrat_convention Rush is right Trump did something once more that had not been done in politics before and few if any could have gotten by with, It was a breath of fresh air in a timeworn political room. Tore into Hillary before the Dem Convention was even close to over for the night.As Rush said ” He was challenging Hillary to do the same thing and calling her out, saying she hasn’t done a press conference in over a year. “will she do it I bet she won’t even come close to how open he was to the media.