Monthly Archives: October 2012

Benghazi ! One Wonders


Benghazi! One wonder if the lack of help sended to help if it was because this ambassador was openly gay? I know the government has said that it support the gay rights act but don’t you kind of wonder just a little. I mean come on e-mails send out hours before the attack and no one payed any mind to it or won’t admit to it. Don’t get me wrong I feel any human life is worth trying to save. I may not agree with Ambassador Chris Stevens lifestyle, but I would not wish the way he died on anyone.

The White House and State Deportment say they were not getting good intel but e-mails begging for help and no one coming to aid Ambassador Chris Stevens sound to me like they left him there to die! gay bashing anyone?

One More thing can anyone tell me why the send an openly gay man to a country that kills gays by stoning them to death whose idea was this anyway.

Leave a comment

Posted by on October 26, 2012 in politics


Tags: , , , , , , ,

The Bill of No Rights

The Bill of No Rights


The following was written by State Representative Mitchell Kaye from Cobb County, GA

We, the sensible people of the United States, in an attempt to help everyone get along, restore some semblance of justice, avoid any more riots, keep our nation safe, promote positive behavior and secure the blessings of debt-free liberty to ourselves and our great-great-great grandchildren, hereby try one more time to ordain and establish some common sense guidelines for the terminally whiny, guilt-ridden delusional and other liberal, commie, pinko bedwetters.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that a whole lot of people were confused by the Bill of Rights and are so dim that they require a Bill of No Rights.

ARTICLE I: You do not have the right to a new car, big screen TV or any other form of wealth. More power to you if you can legally acquire them, but no one is guaranteeing anything.

ARTICLE II: You do not have the right to never be offended. This country is based on freedom, and that means freedom for everyone – not just you! You may leave the room, turn the channel, express a different opinion, etc., but the World is full of idiots, and probably always will be.

ARTICLE III: You do not have the right to be free from harm. If you stick a screwdriver in your eye, learn to be more careful, do not expect the tool manufacturer to make you and all your relatives independently wealthy.

ARTICLE IV: You do not have the right to free food and housing. Americans are the most charitable people to be found, and will gladly help anyone in need, but we are quickly growing weary of subsidizing generation after generation of professional couch potatoes who achieve nothing more than the creation of another generation of professional couch potatoes.

ARTICLE V: You do not have the right to free health care. That would be nice, but from the looks of public housing, we’re just not interested in health care.

ARTICLE VI: You do not have the right to physically harm other people. If you kidnap, rape, intentionally maim or kill someone, don’t be surprised if the rest of us want to see you fry in the electric chair.

ARTICLE VII: You do not have the right to the possessions of others. If you rob, cheat or coerce away the goods or services of other citizens, don’t be surprised if the rest of us get together and lock you away in a place where you still won’t have the right to a big-screen color TV or a life of leisure.

ARTICLE VII: You don’t have the right to demand that our children risk their lives in foreign wars to soothe your aching conscience. We hate oppressive governments and won’t lift a finger to stop you from going to fight if you’d like. However, we do not enjoy parenting the entire world and do not want to spend so much of our time battling each and every little tyrant with a military uniform and a funny hat.

ARTICLE VIII: You don’t have the right to a job. All of us sure want all of you to have one, and will gladly help you along in hard times, but we expect you to take advantage of the opportunities of education and vocational training laid before you to make yourself useful.

ARTICLE X: You do not have the right to happiness. Being an American means that you have the right to pursue happiness – which by the way, is a lot easier if you are unencumbered by an overabundance of idiotic laws created by those of you who were confused by the Bill of Rights.

1 Comment

Posted by on October 24, 2012 in politics


Tags: , , , , ,

The Moderators

Most blogs today will be talking about the debaters.I would like to go back and take a look at the three moderators and give them each a grade of A to F.So let us get to it

Jim Lehrer of PBS his politics would necessarily be Liberal look who the man works for PBS who suck in millions of taxpayer dollars.So I was thinking well he will be supporting Obama and helping him out though this debate but to my surprise Mr.Lehrer was somewhat fair, Mr.Lehrer did help Obama a little, but, all in all, did well I would give him a grade of C

Candy Crowley of CNN is about as Liberal as you can get and in past debates could not keep her opinion out of them I waited to see if Ms.Crowley would do the same with this debate. Surprise, Surprise she was not able to control herself.Ms.Crowley had her nose so far up Obama’s ass I worried she might not be able to take a breath.In some points in the debate not only was Romney debating Obama but Ms.Crowley as well, I will give her a grade F

Bob Schieffer of CBS news is also a self-proclaimed Liberal but over the years he has tried to keep his politics to himself. I expected good thing out of him as a moderator and I was not disappointed out of the three Mr.Schieffer was the best He ask the questions and let the debaters go at it and stayed out of it himself , he was respectful to both men,the only probably I did see was that he gave Obama a little more time other than that he did a perfect job ,I give him the grade of A. maybe it’s his age or how long he’s been on the job. Ms.Crowley needs to watch the tape over and over again to see how it should be done.

All in all, I think the debates were very good.I think that Mr.Romney won the first and the other two were ties not helping or hurting either man

Leave a comment

Posted by on October 23, 2012 in politics


Tags: , , ,

%d bloggers like this: